<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>SolidJott - Latest Comments in When will Solidworks allow for me to lin &amp;#8230;</title><link>http://solidjott.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://solidjott.disqus.com/when_will_solidworks_allow_for_me_to_lin_8230/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:00:56 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: When will Solidworks allow for me to lin &amp;#8230;</title><link>http://solidjott.com/?p=22#comment-3999596</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is one of the main reasons that PDM comes into play. Revision management gets hairy with custom properties and references. There are integrations in Workgroup PDM for this as well. There are reasons to have them separate but it would be nice to link. Everyone does revision management different.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gol10dr</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:00:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When will Solidworks allow for me to lin &amp;#8230;</title><link>http://solidjott.com/?p=22#comment-3999595</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've always wanted it to be tied to the configuration specific custom property. When would one configuration have two drawings?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CharlesCulp</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:29:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When will Solidworks allow for me to lin &amp;#8230;</title><link>http://solidjott.com/?p=22#comment-3999593</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I a agree Charles, a revision should be tied to the model and the drawing.  Seems like it would be pretty straight forward to do so.  I alway's wondered about why it was separate.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rod_Uding</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:18:53 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>